Search This Blog

About this Blog

During the semester, I shall post course material and students will comment on it. Students are also free to comment on any aspect of American politics, either current or historical. There are only two major limitations: no coarse language, and no derogatory comments about people at the Claremont Colleges. This blog is on the open Internet, so post nothing that you would not want a potential employer to see. Syllabus: http://gov20h.blogspot.com/2023/08/draft-introduction-to-american-politics.html

Wednesday, October 12, 2022

Presidency II

  Monday is fall break.  Read these items for Wednesday, October 19.

Government employment

 
Statistic: Number of governmental employees in the U.S. from 1982 to 2021 | Statista
Find more statistics at Statista


Presidents gave relatively few speeches in the 18th and 19th centuries. Washington delivered his Farewell Address in writing.

  • Norms were different.
  • Technology did not allow the president's voice to reach many people

Households with Radio Sets:

1922
60,000
1927
6,750,000
1932         
18,450,000
1937
24,500,000
1942
30,600,000







Source: Historical Statistics of the United States, 796.

FDR and the radio:  Day of Infamy (skip to 4:05).

Data: Public activities


On March 8, 1983, President Reagan spoke to the National Association of Evangelicals in Orlando, He expressed his views on the Soviet Union, famously calling it an "evil empire." He defended the Judeo-Christian traditions against the Soviet Union's totalitarian leadership and lack of religious faith, saying that these differences were at the heart of the conflict between the two nations.


This document makes clear that Reagan did not simply read the words before him:  he played a very active part in writing the speech itself.  One amusing sidelight:  speechwriter Tony Dolan included a spurious quotation from Alexis deTocqueville -- which Reagan changed:




And here is video:

 Reagan, religion, and the spurious Tocqueville line.

And of course, the "evil empire."








Clinton and Social Security (at 37:30)



No comments: