The roots of the non-unanimous jury verdict in Louisiana were to delegitimize the voice of black jury members. This sentiment is antithetical to that expressed in the article we read for Thursday's class.
This blog serves the honors section of our introductory course on American politics (Claremont McKenna College Government 20) for the fall of 2025.
Search This Blog
About this Blog
During the semester, I shall post course material and students will comment on it. Students are also free to comment on any aspect of American politics, either current or historical. There are only two major limitations: no coarse language, and no derogatory comments about people at the Claremont Colleges. This blog is on the open Internet, so post nothing that you would not want a potential employer to see. Syllabus: http://gov20h.blogspot.com/2023/08/draft-introduction-to-american-politics.html
Sunday, October 27, 2019
Unanimous Juries
On Thursday, we discussed how a jury is a place where everyone's voice is equal. This sentiment of total equality reminded me of a case regarding Louisiana's jury system, which permitted non-unanimous jury verdicts. The decision for Ramos v. Louisiana will decide if the 14th incorporates the 6th Amendment's unanimous jury for criminal trials.
The roots of the non-unanimous jury verdict in Louisiana were to delegitimize the voice of black jury members. This sentiment is antithetical to that expressed in the article we read for Thursday's class.The case was recently argued in the Supreme Court; I recommend reading this article from Scotusblog for some highlights from the argument.
The roots of the non-unanimous jury verdict in Louisiana were to delegitimize the voice of black jury members. This sentiment is antithetical to that expressed in the article we read for Thursday's class.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment