Despite his populist appeal and critiques
of Hillary Clinton’s Wall Street ties, this should not be surprising. Trump’s
stated economic agenda entails “a fiscal stimulus plan, tax cuts and a
regulatory rollback,”4 with him specifically vowing to dismantle
Dodd Frank because “banks are unable to lend... It’s slowed down growth.”5
The prospect of less regulation on Wall Street explains why financial stocks
rose 4.1% on Wednesday; similarly, promises to repeal parts of the Affordable
Care Act and institute a more laissez faire approach resulted in healthcare
stocks advancing 3.4%.6 In anticipation of widespread infrastructure
construction projects and fewer energy restrictions, industrial company
Caterpillar Inc.’s stock skyrocketed 7.7%; investors bought other construction
companies’ stocks with similar vigor.7 Conversely, “interest-rate
sensitive real-estate stocks fell 2.3%,” a result of Trump’s plan assuredly causing
high inflation during his term.8
By combining tax cuts-a proposed
6.6% reduction for the country’s highest earners and a 20% reduction in the
corporate income tax rate9-with fiscal stimulus-primarily infrastructure
projects-Trump hopes to ignite a slow-growing economy, and may very well do so;
however, these policies will cause inflation to skyrocket, and public debt will
likely follow suit. Although Trump’s 10 year $1 trillion infrastructure plan
claims to be entirely privately funded, many experts are skeptical that “tax
credits totaling 82% of the equity amount” will lure enough investors to cover
the full cost-or even come close to it.10 In the words of Pat Jones,
executive director of the International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike
Association, the plan “strikes me as sort of a concept paper…as opposed to a
real plan. These are sort of formulaic numbers that you could come up with to
present something that looks like a plan.”11 With public funding-of
which there will be less due to less incoming tax revenue-most likely going to
be necessary to meet the nation’s infrastructure needs, an increase in public
debt seems inevitable under Trump’s plan, even if proposed tax holidays on the
repatriation of overseas profits come into effect.12
Overall, “Trump appears likely to
enact a fun-house mirror version of what many liberal economists have advocated
for years: Keynesian fiscal stimulus,”13 thus raising the question
of whether the Republican President-elect’s own policies will be challenged by
a Republican-dominated Congress. Quiet opposition has already arisen; per the
conservative-leaning Tax Foundation, Trump’s plan would increase the budget
deficit by $10 trillion in five years, even when factoring in expected faster
growth.14 It seems inevitable that Trump will clash with powerful
Tea Party conservatives, such as Ted Cruz, and so-called “budget hawks,” such
as Paul Ryan, over increasing debt during his term, which could jeopardize some
of the proposed policies that are influencing financial markets most now. In the
case that policy, and thus inflation, would not follow Wall Street’s
expectations, drastic sell-offs could cause markets to crash down the line.
1Nazareth, Rita and Anna-Louise
Jackson. “U.S. Stocks Rise, Treasuries Fall as Trump Win Spurs Growth Bets.” Bloomberg, November 8, 2016. Accessed
November 10, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-08/stocks-higher-with-mexican-peso-as-vote-count-nears-yen-weakens
2 Nazareth, Rita and Anna-Louise
Jackson. “U.S. Stocks Rise, Treasuries Fall as Trump Win Spurs Growth Bets.”
3Dieterich, Chris. “Elections Have
Consequences (For Stocks).” The Wall
Street Journal, November 10, 2016. Accessed November 10, http://tk.wsjemail.com/track?t=v&enid=ZWFzPTImbXNpZD0xJmF1aWQ9Jm1pZD02NTQ4NjI4Jm1zZ2lkPTk2ODQwNCZkaWQ9Nzg0OTAwJmVkaWQ9Nzg0OTAwJnNuPTMzOTMzMTA1JmVpZD1sbGl2aW5nc3RvbjIwQGNtYy5lZHUmZWVpZD1sbGl2aW5nc3RvbjIwQGNtYy5lZHUmdWlkPWxsaXZpbmdzdG9uMjBAY21jLmVkdSZyaWQ9MzUyOTgmZXJpZD0zNTI5OCZmbD0wJm12aWQ9MCZ0Z2lkPSZleHRyYT0=&&&15404391&eu=2900&&&http://online.wsj.com/vib
4Kuriloff, Aaron and Nick Timiraos. “Dow
Climbs to a Record.” The Wall Street
Journal, November 11, 2016. Accessed November 11, http://www.wsj.com/articles/dow-climbs-to-a-record-1478822900
5Ackerman, Andrew and Monica
Langley. “Full Repeal of Dodd-Frank Isn’t Main Focus of Trump Transition.” The Wall Street Journal, November 11,
2016. Accessed November 11, 2016, http://www.wsj.com/articles/full-repeal-of-dodd-frankisnt-main-focus-of-trump-transition-1478882550
6Dieterich, Chris. “Elections Have
Consequences (For Stocks).”
7Rich, Gillian. “Caterpillar Stock
Soars on Trump Win on Hope for Coal; GE, Boeing Up.” Investors Business Daily, November 9, 2016. Accessed November 12, http://www.investors.com/news/caterpillar-stock-soars-on-trump-win-on-hope-for-coal-ge-boeing-up/
8 Dieterich, Chris. “Elections Have
Consequences (For Stocks).”
9Irwin, Neil. “The Trump
Administration Could Test Whether Deficits Help the Economy.” The New York Times, November 9, 2016.
Accessed November 11, http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/10/upshot/the-trump-administration-could-test-whether-deficits-help-the-economy.html?_r=0
10Harrison, David. “Donald Trump’s
Infrastructure Plan Faces Speed Bumps.” The
Wall Street Journal, November 11, 2016. Accessed November 11, 2016, http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trumps-infrastructure-plan-faces-speed-bumps-1478884989
11 Irwin, Neil. “The Trump
Administration Could Test Whether Deficits Help the Economy.”
12 Watts, William. “Trump
stock-market rally reflects expectations for new era of fiscal stimulus.” Market Watch, November 12, 2016.
Accessed November 12, 2016, http://www.marketwatch.com/story/trump-stock-market-rally-signals-new-era-of-huge-government-spending-2016-11-10
13 Irwin, Neil. “The Trump
Administration Could Test Whether Deficits Help the Economy.”
14 Irwin, Neil. “The Trump
Administration Could Test Whether Deficits Help the Economy.”
1 comment:
I am curious as to whether the markets would have taken a similar hit if Clinton had been elected. The thought processes outlined behind why a lot of the market saw increases make sense, but don't account for the initial downturn on election night. Also, it is funny to see how Trump's word on his economic policy are taken at face value and thus influence the market, while his policy in all other areas are viewed with skepticism as to feasibility and true intent.
Post a Comment